Schools using Marking.ai
PLACEHOLDER - case studies are being written. What follows describes how schools use Marking.ai, without naming any of them.
How do schools use Marking.ai?
Most start with one department - usually the one carrying the heaviest marking load, such as English or Humanities. A teacher uploads their existing mark scheme and a class set, reviews the drafted first pass, and approves it. Where it spreads, it spreads because the marking workflow already fits: same mark scheme, same standard, evidence behind every mark.
Why there are no case studies here yet
PLACEHOLDER. We would rather show a named school with real numbers than a testimonial with no source attached. Naming a school requires that school's written consent, and outcome figures require measurement we have not published. Both are in progress; neither is here yet.
If your school is using Marking.ai and would be willing to talk about it, we would like to hear from you.
Common questions
Which schools use Marking.ai?
We are not naming schools until each has given written consent to be named. Rather than list logos we have not cleared, this page shows none.
How does a school usually start?
Typically one department, on assessments they already run, using the mark scheme they already have. There is no data migration and no setup project.
Assessment terms explained
Plain-English definitions of the vocabulary used on this page.
- AI markingAI marking is the use of artificial intelligence to assess student work against defined criteria - a mark scheme or a teacher's own marking guidelines - and to draft marks and feedback for a teacher to review.
- Assessment for learningAssessment for learning is the practice of using evidence of what students currently understand to decide what to teach next, and to help students see what they need to do to improve.
- Assessment objectivesAssessment objectives are the categories of skill a qualification tests - commonly labelled AO1, AO2 and AO3 - each carrying a defined share of the available marks.
- Comparative judgementComparative judgement is an assessment method in which markers repeatedly choose the better of two pieces of work, and those paired decisions are combined statistically into a rank order.
- Criterion-referenced assessmentCriterion-referenced assessment judges work against defined standards of what a student should know or be able to do, rather than against how other students performed.
- ExemplarAn exemplar is a piece of work - often a real student answer - presented with its marks and commentary to show what a particular standard looks like in practice.
See it mark a real answer
Book a demo for your school, or start free and mark your own work - no card required.
